Within this per site, i compiled 1,000 users off heterosexual guys and you can 1,000 profiles regarding heterosexual ladies. Users look for users via geographic location, ages, and you may gender strain.
To be certain a geographic dispersion off pages, i picked equivalent amounts of profiles out of four significant towns as well as metropolitan, residential district, and rural section: La, Denver, Chi town, Atlanta, and you can Nyc. We at random picked zip requirements regarding each of the five section to find profiles. Within this for each zip code, for every gender, i up coming at random chose users one of five a long time: early younger adulthood (aged 1830 ages; n = step 1,000; Meters = , SD = step three.17), later more youthful adulthood/very early midlife (old 30forty two age; letter = step 1,000; Yards = , SD = 5.61), late midlife (old fifty64 age; n = 1,000; M = , SD = step three.99), and older adults (aged more than 65 ages; letter = step one,000; Yards = , SD = 4.29). We made use of these types of stratifications https://kissbridesdate.com/american-women/seattle-wa/ in order to guarantee a complete age groups off relationship profiles within the testing. While the the elderly category you’ll make use of up to 3 decades, we treated many years as an ongoing variable instead of while the an effective grouping variable within the analyses.
From for every character, i extracted: gender, age, ethnicity, and About Myself otherwise Within my Words free effect point. In order to guarantee anonymity away from reputation publishers, we failed to see extra group advice (elizabeth.grams., degree, religious choice, income) which could serve as identifying pointers. The fresh testing method is illustrated inside the Secondary Appendix A good .
The brand new attempt varied from inside the many years of 18 so you can 95 years. An independent t-test found no difference in suggest ages for females (M = , SD = ) and you can men (Yards = , SD = ). The fresh post on ethnicity about take to is 70% White/Caucasian, 11% Black/Ebony, 7% Hispanic/Latino, 2% Far-eastern, and you may 10% mixed competition/almost every other.
Reputation content
We made use of the LIWC software to analyze the content of users. This program exercise the newest volume and you can size of particular kinds of terms contained in this a book document. The new LIWC program measures up for each and every word-of a book file with an interior dictionary greater than 4,five-hundred terms and conditions assigned to keyword kinds. This study received with the eleven depending LIWC classes: first-people one pronouns, first-individual plural pronouns, members of the family, family members, functions, conclusion, money, wellness, sexuality, confident feeling, and you can bad feelings. Table 1 includes analogy conditions inside the all the LIWC category (to find out more from these types of codes, get a hold of LIWC, 2007).
We in addition to created a category of terminology for appeal not available inside the oriented LIWC classes. We accompanied procedures to possess structure off LIWC classes ( Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010) by creating a thorough a number of words regarding dictionaries, thesauruses, surveys regarding previous research, and you may terminology from the research group. After that, we chosen twenty five terminology most user off appeal centered on physical appearance for the thesauruses and you will fellow member solutions (elizabeth.grams., lovable, good-appearing, good looking, hot). The new appeal classification was almost completely unlike brand new sexual group, in just one overlapping phrase (sexy). Examples with the elegance classification are used in Dining table 1; on complete variety of words in the attractiveness group, find Supplementary Table step one .
Analytic Strategy
We basic examined descriptive statistics towards proportions of terms and conditions someone various years used in the relationships pages. We along with produced illustrative figures depicting the most popular terms.
We upcoming considered theory assessment using normal minimum squares regression. The outcome parameters contained in this studies have been this new ratio of words fitted all the several kinds on LIWC analyses. The latest LIWC categories were all certainly skewed because of the count of zero opinions (we.elizabeth., participant failed to use people terms in the group). I ran each investigation that have a square-resources transformation (regularly address non-normality within the earlier training utilising the LIWC; DeAndrea, Shaw & Levine, 2010; Hirsh & Peterson, 2009). The newest trend off conclusions are equivalent just after applying the transformations. For ease of translation, findings was demonstrated by using the untransformed LIWC classification studies. Brand new independent varying are age, treated due to the fact a continuous adjustable. I and incorporated gender.
답글 남기기